AHMAS

Thema: ISPOG

• A. Knowledge
• B. Methodical work
• C. Meta compentencies
• D. Demo VSD
• E. E-teaching
• F. ISPOG2019
  • F. ISPOG2019
  • 1. What is a normal woman?
  • 1.00.0 Outline
  • 1.01 Introduction
  • 1.02 Culture
  • 1.03 Great skies
  • 1.04 Landscape = Cityscape
  • 1.05 Architecture
  • 1.06 ISPOG tradition
  • 1.07 Question: what is a normal woman
  • 1.08 Problems
  • 1.09 Question behind the question
  • 1.10 Cultural inversion
  • 1.11 Approach
  • 1.12 Avoidance
  • 1.13 Question behind the question
  • 1.14 Balancing has side effects
  • 1.15 Practical SE
  • 1.16 Conceptual
  • 1.17 Professional
  • 1.18 QbQ
  • 1.19 Prof. navigation tools
  • 1.20 Data
  • 1.21 Literature
  • 1.22 Search engines as knowledge brokers
  • 1.23 Consensus among peers
  • 1.24 No implicit consensus
  • 1.25 QbQ
  • 1.26 Growing mistrust in representation
  • 1.27 Trust is a gift
  • 1.28 Summary
  • 1.29 Connectivity also means...
  • 1.30 Outsourcing
  • 1.31 Dependency & Depression
  • 1.32 QbQ
  • 1.33 Good and bad news
  • 1.34 Bad news first
  • 1.35 Good news
  • 1.36 Energy in 'wicked problems'
  • 1.37 Still looking for solutions?
  • 1.38 Muddling through; a case report
  • 1.39 Muddling through; not a classical recipe
  • 1.40 back to muddling throughout: Reasoning
  • 1.40 The Why
  • 1.41 Idem
  • 1.42 Core problem: Non-lineair causality
  • 1.43 Cause and effect?
  • 1.44 Fly wheel effects; lots of 'risk factors'
  • 1.45 AbA (2)
  • 1.45 Interaction effects
  • 1.46 Non lineair causality
  • 1.47 Complexity >>> Multiplier principle
  • 1.48 Differentiation
  • 1.49 Crucial differentiation
  • 1.50 Create a shared vision
  • 1.51 Clin. reasoning
  • 1.51 Simple & Complicated: Clin.reasoning
  • 1.52 AbA (2)
  • 1.52 Complex: Experiential reasoning
  • 1.53 Emergentism
  • 1.53 Focus on the (educational) process
  • 1.54 Emergentism in detail
  • 1.54 Hell of a job
  • 1.55 Intellectual devil
  • 1.55 Self organisation
  • 1.56 Co-create!
  • 1.56 Cooperation: merging and splitting
  • 1.57 Specialisation
  • 1.57 TEAM
  • 1.58 Remember (Visual) complexity
  • 1.58 Shift between contexts
  • 1.59 Differentiate in (sorts of) criteria
  • 1.59 Remember Eureka!
  • 1.60 Secret: Let it be
  • 1.60 Social criteria
  • 1.61 Aesthetic criteria
  • 1.61 Embrace complexity
  • 1.62 Analogy POM's
  • 1.62 Other context in detail
  • 1.63 Proof of the pudding
  • 1.64 Becoming: Creative prof.
  • 1.64 Muddling through: summary
  • 1.65 Flexible
  • 1.65 There are answers, no solutions
  • 1.66 Diversity in philosophy
  • 1.66 Playground
  • 1.67 Other output & outcome
  • 1.68 Functional + Aesthetic design
  • 1.69 Conditional for Health Literacy
  • 1.70 Creative mindset: CO2 shift
  • 1.70 Method: Cynefin model
  • 1.71 Design Thinking
  • 1.71 Grow young again
  • 1.72 DT-Process
  • 1.72 Wisdom of insecurity
  • 1.73 DT-Products
  • 1.73 Forget solutions, forget Ockham
  • 1.74 DT-Tools: Digi-table
  • 1.74 Induction, deduction and...
  • 1.75 Envision the world as it could be
  • 1.75 Ethics
  • 1.76 Participating Management
  • 1.78 Avoid Group think
  • 1.79 Cognitive overload
  • 1.80 Cogn dissonance
  • 1.81 Leadership
  • 1.82 Inconvenient truth
  • 1.83 Embarrassment
  • 1.84 Toxic environment
  • 1.85 Toxic research
  • 1.86 Toxic management
  • 1.88 Abduction
  • 1.89 Scientific revolution?
  • 1.90 Homo universalis?
  • 1.91 Ownership
  • 1.92 Still a man
  • 1.93 Lessons learned after 64 years
  • 1.94 Normal woman?
  • 1.95 Me personally
  • 1.96 Special Thanks
  • 1.97 Invitation
  • 1.x First: Free ourselves
  • 1.x.31 Create confusion
  • 1.x.32 Visual generation
  • 1.x.33 Ending demoralisation
  • 2. Digitable
  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Leaflet
  • 2.3 Presentation
  • 2.3.1 Why
  • 3. Team support

2. Digitable

In The Hague a demo session will be held to illustrate the potential of the Digitable as an instrument to support Value Based Health Care & Shared Decision Making in a broad sense: 

1. Abstract
2. Leaflet
3. Presentation